Academic intolerance?
Sometimes, I just don’t understand the academic community. I ran across a story about how Italian academics protested the Pope’s visit to a university based on his view of Galileo’s treatment. The Pope had to cancel the visit.
For the record… I agree that the the church mistreated Galileo, and that there should have been more official church recognition of that fact. However… It’s silly for academics to think that they should silence the pontiff when they believed that the ravings of a lunatic jihadi at Columbia were a “learning experience".
IMHO, the academic community should be ashamed of itself. All of the basic reasons used to protest the the Pope (leader of theocracy, outrageous views) and the reasons used to listen to the jihadist (freedom of speech, diversity of views) could be applied to both cases. At this point, I think that academics should consider the meaning of “intolerance".

